Re(2): Increasing ICMP Echo Requests
From: Ken Eichman (keichman_at_cas.org)
Date: 08/18/03
- Previous message: V Khosla: "Re: DCOM95 for Windows 95"
- In reply to: Dan Hanson: "Re: Increasing ICMP Echo Requests"
- Next in thread: Ken Dunham: "RE: Increasing ICMP Echo Requests"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 16:11:52 -0400 (EDT) To: Dan Hanson <dhanson@securityfocus.com>
> It might be my over-paranoid nature, but I think that labeling this, or
> any other worm, as a good samaritan worm is dangerous. We have no way of
> verifying or holding the author accountable, and it may be that some
> hostile functionality exists in the worm and it is simply patching to
> protect itself.
Good point Dan. I was trying to paraphrase the basic description of
the worm I got from various sources - in retrospect I should have left
out my adjectives. Regards, Ken
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Captus Networks - Integrated Intrusion Prevention and Traffic Shaping
- Instantly Stop DoS/DDoS Attacks, Worms & Port Scans
- Automatically Control P2P, IM and Spam Traffic
- Ensure Reliable Performance of Mission Critical Applications
- Precisely Define and Implement Network Security and Performance Policies
**FREE Vulnerability Assessment Toolkit - WhitePapers - Live Demo
Visit us at:
http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CaptusNetworks_incidents_030814
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: V Khosla: "Re: DCOM95 for Windows 95"
- In reply to: Dan Hanson: "Re: Increasing ICMP Echo Requests"
- Next in thread: Ken Dunham: "RE: Increasing ICMP Echo Requests"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|