RE: Strange domain-udp signature

From: Sudom, Don (dsudom1_at_wcb.bc.ca)
Date: 07/17/03

  • Next message: Paul Benedek: "RE: Cisco IOS vulnerability"
    Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 12:10:51 -0700
    To: "Stong, Ian C. (Contractor)" <StongI@ncr.disa.mil>, "Ed Allen Smith" <easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu>
    
    

    It may be common practice for some vendors... However, active
    reconnasance and
    network mapping is unethical regardless of the intent. There are
    passive techniques
    that these vendors can employ to accomplish this task. I actually have
    an FAQ from
    one of these vendors that suggests that everyone permit ICMP traffic so
    that they can
    "statically map" the network to determine the optimal path. You can go
    ahead and permit
    ICMP to your network if you like, but I won't be opening mine any time
    soon.

    Also, I don't have a problem with a couple of probes, but these devices
    are relentless.
    They should be smart enough to remove a node from it's list should an
    answer not be forthcoming.

    Don

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Stong, Ian C. (Contractor) [mailto:StongI@ncr.disa.mil]
    Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:59 AM
    To: Sudom, Don; Ed Allen Smith
    Cc: incidents@lists.securityfocus.com
    Subject: RE: Strange domain-udp signature

    It's very common for DNS load balancers to be configured to "query"
    destinations to determine response time and delay. This information is
    then
    stored and referenced when a DNS request comes in such that the response
    given to the request is based on the best path as of the last snapshot.

    No harm done - but some don't like it as you have to dig further to find
    out
    if it's legitimate query traffic or probes that are precursor to
    attacks.

    Ian

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Sudom, Don [mailto:dsudom1@wcb.bc.ca]
    Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 1:23 PM
    To: Ed Allen Smith
    Cc: incidents@lists.securityfocus.com
    Subject: RE: Strange domain-udp signature

    I've done some more digging and this particular signature is
    from a dns global load balancer designed and used by speedera.com.
    Very annoying, and as far as I'm concerned unauthorized active recon
    is unethical.

    Don

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ----
    Attend the Black Hat Briefings & Training, July 28 - 31 in Las Vegas,
    the 
    world's premier technical IT security event! 10 tracks, 15 training
    sessions, 
    1,800 delegates from 30 nations including all of the top experts, from
    CSO's
    to 
    "underground" security specialists.  See for yourself what the buzz is
    about!  
    Early-bird registration ends July 3.  This event will sell out.
    www.blackhat.com
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ----
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Attend the Black Hat Briefings & Training, July 28 - 31 in Las Vegas, the 
    world's premier technical IT security event! 10 tracks, 15 training sessions, 
    1,800 delegates from 30 nations including all of the top experts, from CSO's to 
    "underground" security specialists.  See for yourself what the buzz is about!  
    Early-bird registration ends July 3.  This event will sell out. www.blackhat.com
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    

  • Next message: Paul Benedek: "RE: Cisco IOS vulnerability"

    Relevant Pages

    • RE: IDSIPS that can handle one Gig
      ... I am not contending your performance figures - 5000 connections per second ... is quite a reasonable amount to assume on your average enterprise network, ... a bit of a bun fight when you place two vendors side by side and ... What is important, however, is the number of packets per second the device ...
      (Focus-IDS)
    • RE: IDSIPS that can handle one Gig
      ... is quite a reasonable amount to assume on your average enterprise network, ... a bit of a bun fight when you place two vendors side by side and ... What is important, however, is the number of packets per second the device ... Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE ...
      (Focus-IDS)
    • Re: Providing Visitor Access
      ... only authorized vendors are allowed to use this restricted VLAN. ... They have to sign the same agreement to use our network as any employee, ... looking at just providing a DSL connection that is not connected to our ...
      (Security-Basics)
    • RE: NIPS Vendors explicit answer
      ... this is the only comprehensive independent IPS test that's been ... Make sure the product continues to block attacks when simple, ... Test the IPS like you would any other network element (switch, ... The other vendors waiting for my tests:) are Netscreen IDP,RealSecure ISS Proventia G200 and Network Associates NAI Intruvert 2600 series. ...
      (Focus-IDS)
    • Linked tables in a query giving no results
      ... The goal of the query is to find project information, ... techniques that were used on that project and vendors that developed ... tables it will show up on the report. ...
      (comp.databases.ms-access)

  • Quantcast