Re: A question for the list...
From: Anders Reed Mohn (anders_rm_at_utepils.com)
Date: 05/20/03
- Previous message: John McCracken: "RE: A question for the list..."
- In reply to: Rob Shein: "RE: A question for the list..."
- Next in thread: Steven: "Re: A question for the list..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: <incidents@securityfocus.com> Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 13:58:36 +0200
>there is even a potential legal issue either, for that matter. As the
virus
>reaches out for an update from a known location, here there was the
>opportunity to cause the virus to elegantly commit suicide; there is no way
>that the code would accidentally be run on an uninfected machine except
with
>the direct participation of that machine's owner.
But what makes you trust the code that is downloaded? I can picture
plenty of commercial or malignent/hostile, uses for such an automatically
downloaded update.
Cheers,
Anders :)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Wireless LAN Policies for Security & Management - NEW White Paper ***
Just like wired networks, wireless LANs require network security policies
that are enforced to protect WLANs from known vulnerabilities and threats.
Learn to design, implement and enforce WLAN security policies to lockdown enterprise WLANs.
To get your FREE white paper visit us at:
http://www.securityfocus.com/AirDefense-incidents
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: John McCracken: "RE: A question for the list..."
- In reply to: Rob Shein: "RE: A question for the list..."
- Next in thread: Steven: "Re: A question for the list..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|