Re: Update on BIND ns_resp.c crash
From: David Conrad (david.conrad_at_nominum.com)
Date: 05/16/03
- Previous message: Harlan Carvey: "Re: Trojan modifying ntdll.dll and cmd.exe"
- In reply to: Gaby Vanhegan: "Update on BIND ns_resp.c crash"
- Next in thread: Gaby Vanhegan: "Re: Update on BIND ns_resp.c crash"
- Reply: Gaby Vanhegan: "Re: Update on BIND ns_resp.c crash"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 12:58:22 -0700 To: Gaby Vanhegan <gaby.vanhegan@englandagency.com>
Hi,
On Friday, May 16, 2003, at 02:31 AM, Gaby Vanhegan wrote:
> I'm staying away from moving over to BIND 9 if possible.
Out of curiosity, why?
> Looking at the vulnerability matrix at the bottom of the ISC/BIND
> security
> page it could have been the libbind resolver bug,
No. The libbind resolver bug only affects applications linked to
libbind. BIND does not use a stub resolver.
Rgds,
-drc
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Wireless LAN Policies for Security & Management - NEW White Paper ***
Just like wired networks, wireless LANs require network security policies
that are enforced to protect WLANs from known vulnerabilities and threats.
Learn to design, implement and enforce WLAN security policies to lockdown enterprise WLANs.
To get your FREE white paper visit us at:
http://www.securityfocus.com/AirDefense-incidents
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: Harlan Carvey: "Re: Trojan modifying ntdll.dll and cmd.exe"
- In reply to: Gaby Vanhegan: "Update on BIND ns_resp.c crash"
- Next in thread: Gaby Vanhegan: "Re: Update on BIND ns_resp.c crash"
- Reply: Gaby Vanhegan: "Re: Update on BIND ns_resp.c crash"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
