Re: RPAT - Realtime Proxy Abuse Triangulation
From: Greg Barnes (greg@ins.com)
Date: 12/30/02
- Previous message: Rob Shein: "RE: RPAT - Realtime Proxy Abuse Triangulation"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Jay D. Dyson: "Re: RPAT - Realtime Proxy Abuse Triangulation"
- Next in thread: Jay D. Dyson: "Re: RPAT - Realtime Proxy Abuse Triangulation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 13:06:35 -0600 From: Greg Barnes <greg@ins.com> To: "Jay D. Dyson" <jdyson@treachery.net>
Hi Jay,
Comments inline...
Saturday, December 28, 2002, 12:51:09 AM, you wrote:
JDD> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
JDD> Hash: SHA1
JDD> On Fri, 27 Dec 2002, Stephen P. Berry wrote:
>> Funny that everyone seems to be hung up on the question of whether or
>> not reciprocal scans are -legal-. Howzabout this one: Even if scanning
>> spam relays is -legal-, is it ethical?
JDD> Such a practice strikes me as teleologically ethical[1]. A system
Technologically Ethical? Is that like 'technically
honest' but not honest by any other definition?
JDD> is being abused and we recipient systems are paying the canonical price
JDD> for it. And since we bear the cost of someone else's irresponsibility, we
JDD> have both the right and the responsibility to pick up the slack created by
JDD> the other party so that other systems do not receive the same net.abuse
JDD> ours have.
This would be true if you represented an extension of
law enforcement.
JDD> The only thing that would color such a practice as even remotely
JDD> unethical would be later utilization of such findings for the purpose of
JDD> further spamming or other nefarious conduct.
Who defines nefarious? The rule of law defines it.
And there are agencies established for the purpose
of enforcing the law. I can't believe this is even
a question here...
JDD> As a rule, when my systems are spammed via an open relay, I do
JDD> indeed perform open relay tests on the offending system to confirm that
JDD> the relayed spam is genuine or trivially spoofed[2]. With those findings,
So how does one justify any scanning beyond that
which is required to determine the source
of a problem in the course of one's day to day duties,
and furthermore with the end goal of notifying the
cognizant authority of the offense?
JDD> I file my reports with the cognizant admins and/or upstream providers so
JDD> that an end may be put to that nonsense.
All well and good, but again - to what end, the additional scanning?
JDD> - -Jay
JDD> 1. I don't subscribe to deontological ethics. Even when I was a lad I
JDD> never regarded "because I said so" as a valid rationale for anything.
JDD> 2. Old Sun Microsystems SMI 8.6 MTAs will accept any HELO statement and
JDD> not log the IP, which caused all manner of spammer mischief.
JDD> ( ( _______
JDD> )) )) .-"There's always time for a good cup of coffee."-. >====<--.
JDD> C|~~|C|~~| (>------ Jay D. Dyson - jdyson@treachery.net ------<) | = |-'
JDD> `--' `--' `How about a 10-day waiting period on YOUR rights?' `------'
JDD> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
JDD> Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (TreacherOS)
JDD> Comment: See http://www.treachery.net/~jdyson/ for current keys.
JDD> iD8DBQE+DUniTqL/+mXtpucRApOlAKDFuMLEvKwX11Toknd0hSFxImXJ/gCeOl1a
JDD> Kmj84nr7KbWgxmjafsVZDm0=
JDD> =Y1yR
JDD> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
JDD> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
JDD> This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service.
JDD> For more information on this free incident handling, management
JDD> and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
-
Regards,
Greg
PGP Fingerprint:
723E 7CAD 4EF5 D904 1EE8 5279 71A5 A594 E6A7 C48E
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service.
For more information on this free incident handling, management
and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
- Next message: Greg Barnes: "Re: RPAT - Realtime Proxy Abuse Triangulation"
- Previous message: Rob Shein: "RE: RPAT - Realtime Proxy Abuse Triangulation"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Jay D. Dyson: "Re: RPAT - Realtime Proxy Abuse Triangulation"
- Next in thread: Jay D. Dyson: "Re: RPAT - Realtime Proxy Abuse Triangulation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|