Re: Port 1080
From: D.Spezialie (dspezialie@optusnet.com.au)
Date: 11/22/02
- Previous message: Russell Fulton: "Re: New scanner?"
- In reply to: Chris Gross: "Port 1080"
- Next in thread: Krueger Lawrence: "RE: Port 1080"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:55:56 +1000 From: "D.Spezialie" <dspezialie@optusnet.com.au> To: Chris Gross <chris@hugehosting.com>
Dear Chris,
Port 1080 is a Socks Proxy port, on that note if you server is a Redhat
distro I would put my money on the Redhat Network Update Tool that is
misconfigured/not-configured. I have expierienced this type of activity
before from the Redhat 7.3 and 8.0 distros trying to contact RHN
*constantly* through my firewall. On those distros the RHN daemon "out
of the box" is started automatically.
D.
Chris Gross wrote:
> We had a large spike in connections through our firewall and we tracked it
> down to a Linux 8.0 server. It was creating about 200K connections with a
> source and destination port of 1080. Has anyone else seen this.
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service.
> For more information on this free incident handling, management
> and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service.
For more information on this free incident handling, management
and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
- Next message: Andy Coates: "RE: Strange apache logs: CONNECT maila.microsoft.com:25"
- Previous message: Russell Fulton: "Re: New scanner?"
- In reply to: Chris Gross: "Port 1080"
- Next in thread: Krueger Lawrence: "RE: Port 1080"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|