Re: spoofed packets to RFC 1918 addresses
From: Daniel Polombo (polombo@cartel-securite.fr)Date: 06/27/02
- Previous message: Cliff Albert: "Re: Someone looking for CodeRed infected boxes ?"
- In reply to: Dirk Koopman: "spoofed packets to RFC 1918 addresses"
- Next in thread: jon schatz: "Re: spoofed packets to RFC 1918 addresses"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 08:42:08 +0200 From: Daniel Polombo <polombo@cartel-securite.fr> To: Dirk Koopman <djk@tobit.co.uk>
Dirk Koopman wrote:
> a) how the attackers are able to "guess" correct (ie existing) rfc1918
> addresses as, AFAIK, these are not being leaked thru the firewall.
There are at least two possibilies that spring to mind :
- if you are using a web proxy for your protected network(s), the proxy
may be adding an X-Forwarded-For field containing the rfc1918 address.
Other protocols might provide the same kind of information as well.
- in some cases, the firewall may leak information about the protected
network if there is some DNAT set up (and in particular, the recent
advisory named "Linux Netfilter NAT/ICMP code information leak" by
Philippe Biondi).
> b) how these packets are getting to me in the first place as they don't
> seem to be source routed.
That's the real catch. I think a number ISPs don't filter rfc1918
addresses within their domains, letting BGP4 make sure they don't get
routed outside instead. So, theoretically, a spoofed packet could make
its way to a target not too far away (eg, within the same AS).
I don't know of any automated tools who would do that, but building one
using antirez's hping, for instance, shouldn't be too hard.
HTH,
Daniel.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service.
For more information on this free incident handling, management
and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
- Previous message: Cliff Albert: "Re: Someone looking for CodeRed infected boxes ?"
- In reply to: Dirk Koopman: "spoofed packets to RFC 1918 addresses"
- Next in thread: jon schatz: "Re: spoofed packets to RFC 1918 addresses"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|