RE: Strange UDP Activity
From: Steve Vawter (svawter@zonelabs.com)Date: 04/16/02
- Previous message: Greg Estabrooks: "Re: Redhat 6.2 Honeypot Hacked"
- Maybe in reply to: LAVELLE,MICHAEL (HP-PaloAlto,ex1): "Strange UDP Activity"
- Next in thread: Jose Nazario: "RE: Strange UDP Activity"
- Next in thread: Rajiv Dighe: "RE: Strange UDP Activity"
- Reply: Jose Nazario: "RE: Strange UDP Activity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Steve Vawter <svawter@zonelabs.com> To: "'LAVELLE,MICHAEL (HP-PaloAlto,ex1)'" <mlavelle@hp.com> Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 10:05:48 -0700
According to my sources (<a href="http://www.iana.org/">Internet Assigned
Numbers Authority</A>)
port 1067/udp (&tcp) is for Installation Bootstrap Proto. Serv., whatever
that means. Where did you find SMTP? SMTP lives on port 25/tcp. Unless
some sites run it in strange places for "security" through obscurity
reasons. Many scanners seem to be using a source of 53/udp recently (I see
the same at home on a dialup) likely to make themselves part of the
background DNS noise. It doesn't work, we see you. Stop.
My comments are my own and have NOTHING to do with Zone Labs or it's
policies.
I'm just a UNIX geek after all. ; }
Steve Vawter
UNIX SYSTEM ADMINISTRATOR
Zone Labs, Inc.
1060 Howard Street
San Francisco CA 94103
ph 415-341-8323
fax 415-341-8299
cell 510-409-9184
pager 877-933-0549
-----Original Message-----
From: LAVELLE,MICHAEL (HP-PaloAlto,ex1) [mailto:mlavelle@hp.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 8:36 AM
To: incidents@securityfocus.com
Subject: Strange UDP Activity
Greetings to the List,
I recently started seeing strange UDP traffic to my home DSL, which is
included below. It has been active for the last 4 days at all hours. None of
these IPs are DNS servers that I use, and much of the activity is when all
of my computers are off. Google led me to port 1067 as being an SNMP port,
but I have SNMP disabled on all devices at home, and the ACL blocks it
anyway.
Is there a new vulnerability going around that I missed? So far I have not
read anything on the list that looks like this...any ideas?
Thanks for listening,
Mike
___________________________
Apr 14 22:44:42: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 100 denied udp 192.36.148.17(53)
-> X.X.55.121(1067), 4 packets
Apr 14 22:44:42: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 100 denied udp 202.12.27.33(53)
-> X.X.55.121(1067), 4 packets
Apr 14 22:44:42: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 100 denied udp 192.112.36.4(53)
-> X.X.55.121(1067), 3 packets
Apr 14 22:44:42: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 100 denied udp 198.32.64.12(53)
-> X.X.55.121(1067), 5 packets
Apr 14 22:46:43: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 100 denied udp 192.33.4.12(53) ->
X.X.55.121(1067), 1 packet
Apr 14 22:46:43: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 100 denied udp 192.5.5.241(53) ->
X.X.55.121(1067), 7 packets
Apr 14 22:48:43: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 100 denied udp 128.9.0.107(53) ->
X.X.55.121(1067), 7 packets
Apr 14 22:48:43: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 100 denied udp 193.0.14.129(53)
-> X.X.55.121(1067), 7 packets
Apr 14 22:49:43: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 100 denied udp 128.8.10.90(53) ->
X.X.55.121(1067), 4 packets
Apr 14 22:49:43: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 100 denied udp 128.63.2.53(53) ->
X.X.55.121(1067), 3 packets
Apr 14 22:49:43: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 100 denied udp 192.203.230.10(53)
-> X.X.55.121(1067), 6 packets
Apr 14 22:49:43: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 100 denied udp 198.41.0.4(53) ->
X.X.55.121(1067), 3 packets
Apr 14 22:49:43: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 100 denied udp 198.41.0.10(53) ->
X.X.55.121(1067), 3 packets
Apr 14 22:49:43: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 100 denied udp 192.36.148.17(53)
-> X.X.55.121(1067), 3 packets
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service.
For more information on this free incident handling, management
and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service.
For more information on this free incident handling, management
and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
- Previous message: Greg Estabrooks: "Re: Redhat 6.2 Honeypot Hacked"
- Maybe in reply to: LAVELLE,MICHAEL (HP-PaloAlto,ex1): "Strange UDP Activity"
- Next in thread: Jose Nazario: "RE: Strange UDP Activity"
- Next in thread: Rajiv Dighe: "RE: Strange UDP Activity"
- Reply: Jose Nazario: "RE: Strange UDP Activity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|