Re: SNMP vulnerability test?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.eduDate: 02/13/02
- Previous message: Gene Barlow: "Re: Strange web request"
- In reply to: Eric Brandwine: "Re: SNMP vulnerability test?"
- Next in thread: Eric Brandwine: "Re: SNMP vulnerability test?"
- Next in thread: Rob Keown: "RE: new SNMP vuln?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Eric Brandwine <ericb@UU.NET> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:55:13 -0500
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002 00:34:00 GMT, Eric Brandwine said:
> What're they printing from? I'd check that first. The number of
> win98/nt/2k hosts listening on SNMP is terrifying.
How did it get turned on? Microsoft said in the CERT advisory:
Summary:
All Microsoft implementations of SNMP v1 are affected by the
vulnerability. The SNMP v1 service is not installed or running by
default on any version of Windows. A patch is underway to eliminate
the vulnerability. In the meantime, we recommend that affected
customers disable the SNMP v1 service.
Is this like the "W2K doesn't install IIS, but if you upgraded a machine
that had Personal Webpage (or whatever it was) it will upgrade that to IIS"?
-- Valdis Kletnieks Computer Systems Senior Engineer Virginia Tech
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Gene Barlow: "Re: Strange web request"
- In reply to: Eric Brandwine: "Re: SNMP vulnerability test?"
- Next in thread: Eric Brandwine: "Re: SNMP vulnerability test?"
- Next in thread: Rob Keown: "RE: new SNMP vuln?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|