Re: gibberish defacement?
From: Eryn Rachell (erynrachell@yahoo.com)Date: 02/04/02
- Previous message: Russell Fulton: "New Nimda scanning pattern ?"
- In reply to: Oliver Petruzel: "gibberish defacement?"
- Next in thread: John Sage: "Re: gibberish defacement?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 11:39:55 -0800 (PST) From: Eryn Rachell <erynrachell@yahoo.com> To: Oliver Petruzel <oliverpetruzel@email.com>, incidents@securityfocus.com
The oldest reference to this was in groups.google.com (UseNet :)
and was used in an example of html and content space ... but I've
not seen it in any defacement ...
- ErynRachell
--- Oliver Petruzel <oliverpetruzel@email.com> wrote:
> Does anyone have any history with the following gibberish? :
>
> ------------ begin snippet
>
> "through a top-down, proactive approach we can remain customer
> focused and goal-directed, innovate and be an inside-out organization
> which facilitates sticky web-readiness transforming turnkey eyeballs
> to brand 24/365 paradigms with benchmark turnkey channels
> implementing viral e-services and dot-com action-items while we take
> that action item off-line and raise a red flag and remember touch
> base as you think about the red tape outside of the box and seize
>
> B2B e-tailers and re-envisioneer innovative partnerships that evolve
> dot-com initiatives delivering synergistic earballs to incentivize
> B2B2C deliverables that leverage magnetic solutions to synergize
> clicks-and-mortar earballs while facilitating one-to-one action-items
> with revolutionary relationships that deliver viral markets and grow
> e-business supply-chains that expedite seamless relationships and
> transform back-end relationships withthrough a top-down, proactive
> approach we can remain customer focused and goal-directed, innovate
> and be an inside-out organization which facilitates sticky
> web-readiness transforming turnkey eyeballs to brand 24/365 paradigms
>
>
> with benchmark turnkey channels implementing viral e-services and
> dot-com action-items while we take that action item off-line and
> raise a red flag and remember touch base as you think about the red
> tape outside of the box and seize B2B e-tailers and re-envisioneer
> innovative partnerships that evolve dot-com initiatives delivering
> synergistic earballs to incentivize"
>
> ---------- end snippet
>
> Searching for lines of the above gibberish on Google, you will see
> numerous websites that appear to have been defaced
> or...something...??
>
> I've encountered both Nix and IIS sites with this issue today...
>
> Any ideas?
> ./op
>
>
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions!
http://auctions.yahoo.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service.
For more information on this free incident handling, management
and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
- Previous message: Russell Fulton: "New Nimda scanning pattern ?"
- In reply to: Oliver Petruzel: "gibberish defacement?"
- Next in thread: John Sage: "Re: gibberish defacement?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]