Re: Nimda esponsibility - Laying appropriatel - implied warranty of sale
From: Chip Mefford (cmefford@avwashington.com)Date: 09/28/01
- Previous message: Neil Dickey: "Re: Nimda et.al. versus ISP responsibility - Laying responsibility where it belongs"
- In reply to: fosterd : "Re: Nimda esponsibility - Laying appropriatel - implied warranty of sale"
- Next in thread: Jay D. Dyson: "Re: Nimda esponsibility - Laying appropriatel - implied warranty of sale"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 12:44:48 -0400 From: Chip Mefford <cmefford@avwashington.com> To: fosterd@airshow.net Subject: Re: Nimda esponsibility - Laying appropriatel - implied warranty of sale Message-ID: <20010928124448.I1386@crow.avwashington.com>
On 2001.09.28 10:39 fosterd wrote:
> I see one problem as how to recompense those who have been
> harmed.
How about this,
Welcome to the Internet;
No warranties expressed or implied,
use at YOUR OWN RISK.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service.
For more information on this free incident handling, management
and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
- Previous message: Neil Dickey: "Re: Nimda et.al. versus ISP responsibility - Laying responsibility where it belongs"
- In reply to: fosterd : "Re: Nimda esponsibility - Laying appropriatel - implied warranty of sale"
- Next in thread: Jay D. Dyson: "Re: Nimda esponsibility - Laying appropriatel - implied warranty of sale"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]