Re: 24 hour strobes from 10.0.x.x

From: Konrad Michels (konrad@overnetdata.com)
Date: 08/23/01


Message-ID: <3B84B963.6030103@overnetdata.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 09:05:55 +0100
From: Konrad Michels <konrad@overnetdata.com>
To: Graham Bignell <gbignell@724.com>
Subject: Re: 24 hour strobes from 10.0.x.x

I was even more perturbed when I called the support line of my upstream
provider and the response was "huh?" and, after putting me on hold for a
while, "Sorry, there is nothing we can do about it from here - call your
account manager"!

What our account manager was going to do about it was a little beyond
me, but I called her anyway. Her line was busy, so I left a message and
have still not been called back! Surprise surprise!

Given the raft of problems we've had with our upstream provider to date,
I can't say the response was unexpected.

Unfortunately, I inherited the firewalls when I got here, and while they
are fairly decent ones, they have a windoze only gui (even though the
firewall itself is a customised version of Linux & ipchains), which only
allows me to deny packets and not drop them.

I was busy configuring a Linux box with iptables yesterday to put
between the router & the firewall to create a black hole for the
packets, but just before I finished, the attack stopped! Go figure!

Graham Bignell wrote:

>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Be very disturbed that your upstream provider isn't filtering out
> those spoofed packets; they should not allow the rfc1918 netblocks
> to or from your network. Seriously, it should be in your contract.
>
> Your firewall should also be dropping these packets by default, is
> your issue the rate at which you are getting hit with traffic so
> the device is kept busy?
>
> - ---
> Graham "Lorax" Bignell
> 724 Solutions Inc.
>
> - -----Original Message-----
> From: Konrad Michels [mailto:konrad@overnetdata.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 7:53 AM
> To: incidents@securityfocus.com
> Subject: 24 hour strobes from 10.0.x.x
>
>
> For the last 24 hours I've had our firewall hammered repeatedly from
> 10.0.1.1 - 10.0.1.9, all 9 addresses simultaneously going at all ports
> over 1024, over and over again!
>
> Obviously spooofed packet headers - and just as I got annoyed enough to
> want to start digging a bit deeper, the silly buggers stop! Now isn't
> that annoying! Anyway, what was interesting about this was also that,
> if I changed the IP address of the firewall's external interface say one
> up or one down, the ruddy things followed it! Obviously then whatever
> it was, was continuously strobing a whole block of IP addresses!
>
> Anyone else seen anything like this lately?
>
> Later
> Konrad
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP 7.1
>
> iQA/AwUBO4P0wzfvNyvTILx2EQKU9QCff0e5p9FAm6Vm7gJfNr68sIiPI4cAoIx+
> 2UGhwI2u5xO5oclMfijIEuEO
> =14Qu
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>

-- 
****************************************************
*                                                  *
* Please note that I will not be in the office     *
* on Friday 24 August.                             *
*                                                  *
****************************************************

---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com



Relevant Pages

  • Re: iptables and dhcp
    ... > the same physical network segment as the firewall and the remote DHCP ... You used INPUT and not FORWARD chain ... # This target allows packets to be marked in the mangle table ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)
  • Re: Trouble accessing Outlook Web Access from behind firewall
    ... When starting the firewall I also set ... > rejected and dropped packets are logged, however I see nothing in my log ... > # Higher ports needed to accept incoming/outgoing calls ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: Visnetic and 8signs firewall LOOPHOLE Read....
    ... I said I am just reporting bug in your Firewall, ... From the Port Scan/Properties control screen: ... The firewall filtered 100% of the packets that were received. ... operating system (I'm talking Windows, ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: strange network traffic
    ... Maybe not so wise to not have a firewall and trust a third party lurker to ... Subject: strange network traffic ... > -> connection established, following packets have neither SYN nor ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • Re: port 80 is open
    ... The firewall drops all packets initiated ... > internet the ISP router does not send the unreachable message. ... and then close the connection as your IP is seen as not connected. ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)