BSM and syslog... why should I consider the first?
From: Simone Vernacchia (simonevernacchia_at_yahoo.it)
Date: 07/08/05
- Next in thread: Robert Escue: "Re: BSM and syslog... why should I consider the first?"
- Reply: Robert Escue: "Re: BSM and syslog... why should I consider the first?"
- Maybe reply: Freeman, Michael: "RE: BSM and syslog... why should I consider the first?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 09:18:42 +0200 To: focus-sun@securityfocus.com
Hello everyone,
I'm working on a Security program for a large infrastructure.
I have to deal with Sun Solaris, and I was wondering why I should
consider logging via BSM and not syslog.
System admins have a good knowledge of syslog, and I can standardize
logging in different UNIX OSes easily if I use it.
Is there some breaking feature which could make me prefer BSM?
Is there a reason to use syslog and BSM?
Thanks in advance,
G0k
- Next in thread: Robert Escue: "Re: BSM and syslog... why should I consider the first?"
- Reply: Robert Escue: "Re: BSM and syslog... why should I consider the first?"
- Maybe reply: Freeman, Michael: "RE: BSM and syslog... why should I consider the first?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|