64-bit GCC (was: Re: ipf, Sunscreen or ?)
From: Chad Schrock (chad_at_radix.net)
Date: 10/24/03
- Previous message: Alex Noordergraaf: "Re: ipf, Sunscreen or ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 19:17:32 -0400 (EDT) To: focus-sun@securityfocus.com
< From: "Bryan Guest, BMI Internet" <bryan.guest@bmts.com>
<
< Hi:
<
< What happened with IPF that burned you before? I have successfully
< deployed IPF on Solaris 7,8 and 9.
I'm running ipf on my S9 system now; ipf even worked without
a problem on the S9 beta system that I had.
[snip]
< Second, if you are rolling your own on Solaris 9, you can't compile
< 64bit binaries using GCC. Something beyond me about the way GCC
< makes 64bit binaries for Solaris 9 doesn't work, so you have to
< use the Sun compiler. It might not be a Solaris 9 issue, I have
< only tried the 64bit package there.
Which what version of gcc? The 64-bit output of gcc has worked
since at least 3.1. (The 2.x.x releases blew chunks with 64-bit
output on Solaris.)
The last time I built ipf from source I used gcc 3.2.1 or .2 and
ipfx built (and works) without a problem.
chad
-- chad at radix dot net
- Previous message: Alex Noordergraaf: "Re: ipf, Sunscreen or ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
