RE: Better Syslog server
From: Patrik Sternudd (patrik.sternudd@copper.se)
Date: 03/18/03
- Previous message: Oddbjorn Steffensen: "Re: Better Syslog server"
- Maybe in reply to: Matt Harris: "Better Syslog server"
- Next in thread: Rex Monty di Bona: "RE: Better Syslog server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Patrik Sternudd <patrik.sternudd@copper.se> To: "'mdh@unix.si.edu'" <mdh@unix.si.edu>, focus-sun@securityfocus.com Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 09:07:09 +0100
This has been discussed in depth on the LogAnalysis mailing list
(everything from alternative servers to a complete
rewrite of the syslog protocol to accomodate more flexibility)
http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis
For direct product hints, I suggest you take a look at Syslog-NG.
http://www.balabit.com/products/syslog_ng/
It's a clear favourite of mine. Very flexible.
Then we have msyslog from CORE-SDI. Supports some crypto stuff as well,
but I think syslog-ng may be preferable in your case.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/msyslog/
There are certainly several others out there with varying
quality (there are even a bunch that run on NT/W2K, but I won't
go into that, this being a Sun mailing list and all...)
HTH,
Patrik Sternudd
- Previous message: Oddbjorn Steffensen: "Re: Better Syslog server"
- Maybe in reply to: Matt Harris: "Better Syslog server"
- Next in thread: Rex Monty di Bona: "RE: Better Syslog server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]