Re: RSA SecureID on Solaris
From: adam morley (adam@gmi.com)Date: 04/08/02
- Previous message: Reg Quinton: "Re: Disabling Unnecessary Services from inetd.conf File"
- In reply to: Norman Girard: "Re: RSA SecureID on Solaris"
- Next in thread: Doug Hughes: "Re: RSA SecureID on Solaris"
- Next in thread: Jonathan A. Zdziarski: "RE: RSA SecureID on Solaris"
- Reply: Doug Hughes: "Re: RSA SecureID on Solaris"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 11:24:22 -0700 From: adam morley <adam@gmi.com> To: focus-sun@securityfocus.com
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 02:20:18PM +0200, Norman Girard wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 20:46, adam morley wrote:
[snip]
> > Has anyone looked into how "secure" they are? Can one guess the number on the display, perhaps based on the serial on the back?
> There's no relation between the seed and the serial number.
> The synchronisation between the RSA ACE Server and the token is made by
> an algoritm which takes two parameters in : a seed (64 bits) and the
> current time (UCT).
> Your tokens are provided with a floppy disk which contains an encrypted
> flat file (.asc) you need to import to your ACE Server. The file
> contains, for each token, the serial number (you can find on the back of
> the token), the seed and few others parameters about the token (6 or 8
> digits / 30 s, 1 min or 2 min / etc.).
> The algorithm has been broken in December 2000 but you need to have the
> seed in order to generate tokencodes. You can find more information
> about this algorithm in :
> http://www.atstake.com/research/reports/initial_securid_analysis.pdf.
so im currently reading this, and it occurs to me: if you know one token value, and the time of day you capture that token value, you can brute force to find the secret, if you know the algorithm (i take it its "known"?). then you can, effectively, clone the device, correct? I was hoping @stake would've released the follow up paper they talk about in the last paragraph, but it doesn't look like it (from their site)
of course, this is all on the basis that a only ONE 64-bit secret will produce a given tokencode at time x. if there are two, i have to throw my hands up in the air and wave 'em like i just don't care.
thoughts?
- Previous message: Reg Quinton: "Re: Disabling Unnecessary Services from inetd.conf File"
- In reply to: Norman Girard: "Re: RSA SecureID on Solaris"
- Next in thread: Doug Hughes: "Re: RSA SecureID on Solaris"
- Next in thread: Jonathan A. Zdziarski: "RE: RSA SecureID on Solaris"
- Reply: Doug Hughes: "Re: RSA SecureID on Solaris"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|