Re: chroot'ing ftpd
From: focus-sun@anastrophe.comDate: 12/17/01
- Previous message: Casper Dik: "Re: login bug and Solaris 9"
- In reply to: Michael Tucker: "RE: chroot'ing ftpd"
- Next in thread: Doug Hughes: "Re: chroot'ing ftpd"
- Reply: Doug Hughes: "Re: chroot'ing ftpd"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: focus-sun@anastrophe.com To: focus-sun@securityfocus.com Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 18:59:20 GMT
Michael Tucker writes:
> Hence the market niche for products like wu-ftpd (don't use this! it's
> riddled with security holes!) and proftpd (use this instead).
proftpd is better than wuftpd, but it's had it's share of security holes
too.
Ncftpd has never had any. I've been using it continuously for at least four
years (maybe five?) and it has performed flawlessly. it's not free, but in
this case, you get what you pay for, by far.
---------------------------------
Paul Theodoropoulos
paul@anastrophe.net
Senior Unix Systems Administrator
Syntactically Subversive Services, Inc.
http://www.anastrophe.com
Downtime Is Not An Option
- Previous message: Casper Dik: "Re: login bug and Solaris 9"
- In reply to: Michael Tucker: "RE: chroot'ing ftpd"
- Next in thread: Doug Hughes: "Re: chroot'ing ftpd"
- Reply: Doug Hughes: "Re: chroot'ing ftpd"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|