chroot and BIND
From: Heather Flanagan (hlf00@earthlink.net)Date: 10/18/01
- Previous message: Jerry Litteer: "RE: Announcing Solaris Security Paper"
- Next in thread: Heather Flanagan: "Re: chroot and BIND"
- Reply: Heather Flanagan: "Re: chroot and BIND"
- Reply: Don Lopez: "Re: chroot and BIND"
- Reply: Joseph Tam: "Re: chroot and BIND"
- Reply: Skip Carter: "Re: chroot and BIND"
- Reply: Darren Moffat: "Re: chroot and BIND"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Message-ID: <20011018193457.9976.qmail@earthlink.net> From: "Heather Flanagan" <hlf00@earthlink.net> To: focus-sun@securityfocus.com Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 15:34:56 -0400 Subject: chroot and BIND
I'm seeing the wierdest behavior out of a new BIND server I'm setting up - dates spit out by BIND are completely out of synch with the dates recorded by the system itself. Here's an example from /var/adm/messages:
Oct 18 23:11:33 ns1 ntpdate[3873]: [ID 398266 daemon.notice] waiting 120 seconds before trying again
Oct 19 03:13:26 ns1 usr/local/sbin/named[3755]: [ID 866145 daemon.info] refresh_callback: zone xx.xx.xx.in-addr.arpa/IN: failure in request to 10.10.10.15#53: clocks are unsynchronized
Oct 18 23:13:37 ns1 ntpdate[3873]: [ID 398266 daemon.notice] waiting 240 seconds before trying again
Oct 19 03:16:42 ns1 usr/local/sbin/named[3755]: [ID 866145 daemon.info] refresh_callback: zone domain.com/IN: failure in request to 10.10.10.15#53: clocks are unsynchronized
Oct 18 23:17:41 ns1 ntpdate[3873]: [ID 398266 daemon.notice] waiting 300 seconds before trying again
As you can see, I'm also working on xntpd...
Is there a "feature" when using chroot to start up named that would cause this behavior? Creating a secure BIND is not quite as easy as I'd hoped!
Thanks
-heather f.
--
- Previous message: Jerry Litteer: "RE: Announcing Solaris Security Paper"
- Next in thread: Heather Flanagan: "Re: chroot and BIND"
- Reply: Heather Flanagan: "Re: chroot and BIND"
- Reply: Don Lopez: "Re: chroot and BIND"
- Reply: Joseph Tam: "Re: chroot and BIND"
- Reply: Skip Carter: "Re: chroot and BIND"
- Reply: Darren Moffat: "Re: chroot and BIND"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|