Re: BIND and 32774 or 32775 UDP ports
From: John Jasen (jjasen1@umbc.edu)Date: 10/10/01
- Previous message: Darren Moffat: "Re: Solaris 2.5.1 PAM"
- In reply to: Crist J. Clark: "Re: BIND and 32774 or 32775 UDP ports"
- Next in thread: Abel_Lopez@3com.com: "Re: BIND and 32774 or 32775 UDP ports"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 13:35:01 -0400 From: John Jasen <jjasen1@umbc.edu> To: <focus-sun@securityfocus.com> Subject: Re: BIND and 32774 or 32775 UDP ports Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.31L.02.0110101330030.7781639-100000@irix2.gl.umbc.edu>
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Crist J. Clark wrote:
> > I am not sure why this ports are being put in listening state by BIND. Any
> > ideas ...?
>
> It just made a query or two to some DNS servers and is waiting for a
> response? Or does it keep these two open for long periods?
bind, at least from somewhere in the 8.x releases on up, will use a
non-privileged port for queries to other nameservers.
In order to stop this, or to set it to specific port # (rather than
random), add this to the named.conf and restart:
query-source address * port 53;
-- -- John E. Jasen (jjasen1@umbc.edu) -- In theory, theory and practise are the same. In practise, they aren't.
- Previous message: Darren Moffat: "Re: Solaris 2.5.1 PAM"
- In reply to: Crist J. Clark: "Re: BIND and 32774 or 32775 UDP ports"
- Next in thread: Abel_Lopez@3com.com: "Re: BIND and 32774 or 32775 UDP ports"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|