Re: IPSEC on Solaris 8
From: Chris Ricker (kaboom@gatech.edu)Date: 10/02/01
- Previous message: Aaron Ferguson: "RE: Thanks to all (was Re: Solaris, Sudo, and locking...)"
- In reply to: adam morley: "Re: IPSEC on Solaris 8"
- Next in thread: Trevor Fiatal: "Re: IPSEC on Solaris 8"
- Next in thread: Stephen Gillis: "Re: IPSEC on Solaris 8"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 08:16:19 -0600 (MDT) From: Chris Ricker <kaboom@gatech.edu> To: SUN-sec Mailinglist <focus-sun@securityfocus.com> Subject: Re: IPSEC on Solaris 8 Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110020814000.24758-100000@verdande.oobleck.net>
<Adam, your MUA line wrap doesn't>
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, adam morley wrote:
> Overview of IPsec:
>
> http://docs.sun.com/ab2/coll.47.11/SYSADV3/@Ab2PageView/22211?DwebQuery=ipsec&oqt=ipsec&Ab2Lang=C&Ab2Enc=iso-8859-1
Related question: is there a summary any place of the performance hits
imposed by ESP and AH? I've noticed it seems rather severe....
later,
chris
- Previous message: Aaron Ferguson: "RE: Thanks to all (was Re: Solaris, Sudo, and locking...)"
- In reply to: adam morley: "Re: IPSEC on Solaris 8"
- Next in thread: Trevor Fiatal: "Re: IPSEC on Solaris 8"
- Next in thread: Stephen Gillis: "Re: IPSEC on Solaris 8"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
