Re: read-only file systems
From: Rich Teer (richard.teer@rite-group.com)Date: 09/11/01
- Previous message: Heather Flanagan: "read-only file systems"
- In reply to: Heather Flanagan: "read-only file systems"
- Next in thread: Kurt Seifried: "Re: read-only file systems"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 19:35:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Rich Teer <richard.teer@rite-group.com> To: Heather Flanagan <HeathFla@reciprocal.com> Subject: Re: read-only file systems Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0109101930560.818-100000@grover.rite-group.com>
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Heather Flanagan wrote:
> I know /usr can be comfortably turned in to a read-only file system for
> particularly hardened systems - or at least I can't think of any reason why
> not. Can the same be done with / on Solaris 8?
It depnds on how broken down your / is. Dy definition, most
files under /var for example are written to at some stange.
I suspect that if one separated out /var, / could be made
read only. (Naturally, user data lives on other disks or
partitions.)
-- Rich TeerPresident, Rite Online Inc.
Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638 URL: http://www.rite-online.net
- Previous message: Heather Flanagan: "read-only file systems"
- In reply to: Heather Flanagan: "read-only file systems"
- Next in thread: Kurt Seifried: "Re: read-only file systems"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|