Re: tcpwrapped rpcbind/portmap?
From: Vladimir Ivanov (VIvanov@tee.toshiba.de)Date: 08/21/01
- Previous message: Lance Spitzner: "Armoring Solaris: II"
- In reply to: Casper ***: "Re: tcpwrapped rpcbind/portmap?"
- Next in thread: Hal Flynn: "Re: tcpwrapped rpcbind/portmap?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Message-ID: <3B821FB0.8B5E49F1@tee.toshiba.de> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 10:45:36 +0200 From: Vladimir Ivanov <VIvanov@tee.toshiba.de> To: focus-sun@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: tcpwrapped rpcbind/portmap?
> If so, what would "safer" mean?
> o Not listening to the world at all optionally)
> o No indirect calls (optionally)
> o "wrapped" functionality.
IMHO, If at some point in future all services (including rpcbind) will
be wrapped this will add additional unified protection level.
-- Vladimir Ivanov System Administrator E-Mail: VIvanov@tee.toshiba.de Toshiba Electronics Europe GmbH Tel/Fax: +49-211-5296-297/386
- Previous message: Lance Spitzner: "Armoring Solaris: II"
- In reply to: Casper ***: "Re: tcpwrapped rpcbind/portmap?"
- Next in thread: Hal Flynn: "Re: tcpwrapped rpcbind/portmap?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]