Re: SunScreen Lite vs. IPF.From: Tan Wee Yeh (firstname.lastname@example.org)
- Previous message: Matthew Collins: "Re: NFS Security Question"
- In reply to: Neil Dickey: "RE: SunScreen Lite vs. IPF."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 13:26:32 +0800 From: Tan Wee Yeh <email@example.com> To: Focus-Sun <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: Re: SunScreen Lite vs. IPF. Message-ID: <20010816132632.A2368@comp.nus.edu.sg>
Thanks to all who have replied.
Like I've mentioned, the most important feature is for the
software to work with SunCluster3.0. Due to some complications
with delivery, the Cluster software is delayed and will eat into
the time we have to test the machines before deployment. In any
case, I'll take the time to play with both SunScreen & IPFilter.
Will post a further report afterwards.
-- Tan Wee Yeh email@example.com http://www.pobox.com/~wytan For PGP public key : http://www.pobox.com/~wytan/pgp PGP fingerprint = CB 11 61 BE 4E EF FB 84 71 15 CF 22 46 FD 4C B3