ACL question
From: Stu Baker (stubaker_at_northwestern.edu)Date: 07/18/01
- Vorherige Nachricht: Gregory_DeGennaro_at_csaa.com: "RE: primes file in openssh?"
- Nächste im Thread: Doug Hughes: "Re: ACL question"
- Antwort: Doug Hughes: "Re: ACL question"
- Antwort: Darren Moffat: "Re: ACL question"
- Nachrichten sortiert nach: [ Datum ] [ Thread ] [ Subject ] [ Autor ] [ Attachement ]
I am trying to figure out the appropriate default ACLs for a
directory so that when somebody creates new files/directories
underneath that directory it will inherit the ACLs from the parent
directory.
I tried this command:
setfacl -s u::rwx,g::rwx,o:r-x,m:rwx,d:u::rw-,d:g::rw-,d:o:r-x,d:m:rwx testdir
And then issued the command giving ACLs to the particular group I
want to have permissions (in addition to the owner and group)
setfacl -m g:lms:rwx testdir
However subsequent file and directories created underneath the parent
assume the default umask of the user, they don't seem to inherit the
ACLs of the parent directory.
Is what I want to do possible? if so what am I doing wrong?
--
Stu Baker
<mailto:stubaker_at_northwestern.edu>
<http://www.stubaker.com/>
"Given a choice between NT and anything else, take anything else."
- Scott T. Swanson
- Vorherige Nachricht: Gregory_DeGennaro_at_csaa.com: "RE: primes file in openssh?"
- Nächste im Thread: Doug Hughes: "Re: ACL question"
- Antwort: Doug Hughes: "Re: ACL question"
- Antwort: Darren Moffat: "Re: ACL question"
- Nachrichten sortiert nach: [ Datum ] [ Thread ] [ Subject ] [ Autor ] [ Attachement ]
Relevant Pages
|
|