RE: default for requiring authentication 2003
- From: "Kurt Dillard" <kurtdillard@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:38:56 -0300
Murda,
You are correct, in Windows XP, 2003, and later the Everyone group only
includes Authenticated Users, it no longer includes Anonymous Users. You can
change this but Microsoft strongly recommends against doing so. Your nemesis
is thinking of older versions of Windows.
Kurt
-----Original Message-----
From: listbounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:listbounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Murda Mcloud
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:45 PM
To: focus-ms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: default for requiring authentication 2003
I'm having a debate with someone over whether a 2003 server by default
(OOB)forces someone to authenticate(whether to a DC or to the server itself
if standalone) before allowing access to files.
He seems to think that the default is that no authentication is required and
consequently anyone could rock up and connect a laptop to a network with
that server on it and get access to files on it-as the EVERYONE group is
given read permissions to new folders etc.
I say he is wrong but am looking hard to find something to back me up.
I understand that the guest account could access files as it is part of the
EVERYONE group but it's disabled by default-but still, there is an
authentication process for guest to login
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: default for requiring authentication 2003
- From: Murda Mcloud
- RE: default for requiring authentication 2003
- References:
- default for requiring authentication 2003
- From: Murda Mcloud
- default for requiring authentication 2003
- Prev by Date: RE: default for requiring authentication 2003
- Next by Date: RE: default for requiring authentication 2003
- Previous by thread: RE: default for requiring authentication 2003
- Next by thread: RE: default for requiring authentication 2003
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|