RE: Binding Windows Services to Specific Addresses Only
- From: "Wayne S. Anderson" <wfrazee@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 21:11:17 -0600
Localized port proxies, custom service implementations, etc. E.g.
application with traffic acceptance on a web server hosted on a standardized
port which then subsequently communicates using a non-web communication
stream.
SCW can only anticipate what it KNOWS to look for. As a result when you are
using custom applications, you have to have an understanding of security
concepts and apply that dynamically to the specifics of your environment.
I have seen SCW break custom and boutique web apps that have secondary
processes which handle other portions of processing or communication for the
overall programmatic system.
Wayne S. Anderson
http://www.linkedin.com/in/wayneanderson
-----Original Message-----
From: listbounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:listbounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Ken Schaefer
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 9:39 PM
To: focus-ms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Binding Windows Services to Specific Addresses Only
Can you elaborate on what types of things SCW can break for a "custom web
app" or a "multitier app" (as opposed to any other type of app?)
Obviously if you start removing extension mappings, or you disable NTLM,
then certain pieces of IIS functionality no longer work. But that's
reasonably obvious. What other types of gotchas as there?
Cheers
Ken
-----Original Message-----
From: listbounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:listbounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wayne S. Anderson
Sent: Saturday, 10 May 2008 8:24 AM
To: 'Devin Ganger'; 'Steve Friedl'; 'Christian Koerner'
Cc: focus-ms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Binding Windows Services to Specific Addresses Only
The only thing with using SCW in such a way is that if you are doing
multi-tier web applications, SCW can break things. Even more so if you
are
doing anything with non-default configurations.
My list was looking more towards principles rather than focusing on the
technical accomplishment of those points.
SCW is an excellent starting point for default services however I would
advise being careful applying it after a custom web application and
also
MAKE SURE you have a lab environment or developer test with the SCW
configuration after it is applied. Build in time in your project
schedule,
if applicable, for someone with appropriate experience to troubleshoot.
-W
Wayne S. Anderson
-----Original Message-----
From: Devin Ganger [mailto:DevinG@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 11:43 AM
To: wfrazee@xxxxxxxxxx; 'Steve Friedl'; 'Christian Koerner'
Cc: focus-ms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Binding Windows Services to Specific Addresses Only
This is a great list, Wayne!
However, I've got one addition for you.
Wayne S. Anderson wrote:
3) Immediately review the service configuration and default
accounts. If you don't need them, disable them, or in the
case of services at least set them to manual so they do not
run by default. With Windows default accounts, make sure that
the steps that you can take, you have.
<snip>
With the services, take the most restrictive approach possible.
Remember, if something doesn't start, we can always restart
whatever was stopped so its ok if something now fails to start.
We just make the necessary adjustments and restart it and we
know not to stop that particular service again ;) You ARE
building the security for this server while it is in a build
or pre-production stage..... right? You should be able to risk
causing other service failures while you determine what services
are necessary.
Don't forget that with Windows Server 2003 SP1 and later, the OS
includes a
great tool for automating a lot of this work for you -- the Security
Configuration Wizard. You'll need to go into Add/Remove Programs,
Add/Remove
Windows Components to ensure that it's installed on the system, but
once you
do -- it's a great tool that allows you to define and manage security
policy
for multiple systems.
- References:
- Binding Windows Services to Specific Addresses Only
- From: Christian Koerner
- Re: Binding Windows Services to Specific Addresses Only
- From: Steve Friedl
- RE: Binding Windows Services to Specific Addresses Only
- From: Wayne S. Anderson
- RE: Binding Windows Services to Specific Addresses Only
- From: Devin Ganger
- RE: Binding Windows Services to Specific Addresses Only
- From: Wayne S. Anderson
- RE: Binding Windows Services to Specific Addresses Only
- From: Ken Schaefer
- Binding Windows Services to Specific Addresses Only
- Prev by Date: RE: XP Hardening
- Next by Date: SecurityFocus Microsoft Newsletter #395
- Previous by thread: RE: Binding Windows Services to Specific Addresses Only
- Next by thread: RE: Binding Windows Services to Specific Addresses Only
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|