Re: U3 TEchnology was RE: strange new virus
- From: "Thor (Hammer of God)" <thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:10:40 -0800
Hey James... inline:
On 12/15/06 5:07 PM, "James D. Stallard" <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> spoketh to
all:
Thor, et al
Question regarding autorun on USB flash disks (I never like the term
"thumbdrive"):
If you have a file in the root called "autorun.inf" and it contains a valid
syntax for an icon file, the icon will appear as the drive icon in Windows
Explorer. This most certainly works with XPSP2+patches.
Actually, you'll get a drive icon whether it has an autorun.inf or not...
That's just Windows identifying the device as a mountable drive. The
autorun doesn't do anything... Even with it present (on my systems) it
doesn't even ask you to run it.
The OS is clearly executing something, just not your arbitrary code.
The question is, would it be possible to take advantage of the icon
functionality (presumably within explorer.exe) to hijack the process and run
your own code? I'm thinking buffer overflow as the most likely scenario, but
I'm also thinking that following MS "trustworthy computing initiative" and
XPSP2, the existence of buffer overflow possibilities in the OS is pretty
minimal these days.
Well, that's the trick... Explorer.exe is just saying "This device mounted
as a drive letter, and here it is." Yes, it's "running code" (Actually, I
would guess that the code is already running and that it just renums
available drives by type) but as you said, it's not running any code on the
device itself.
Sure you could hijack the process, but that would mean that the OS was
already compromised in some way, or that you've already got code on the box
to do that (a rootkit could easily do this. Well, "easily" if you know how
;). But at that point, it's moot. I don't see how you could do that with
any data that requires it be loaded from the device to then exploit some
vector, even if such vector exists. But even if you could, and you really
wanted to go down that path, I think it would be easier to just get yourself
a U3 drive so that stuff like autorun would work by design.
t
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: U3 TEchnology was RE: strange new virus
- From: James D. Stallard
- RE: U3 TEchnology was RE: strange new virus
- Prev by Date: RE: U3 TEchnology was RE: strange new virus
- Next by Date: Re: U3 TEchnology was RE: strange new virus
- Previous by thread: Re: U3 TEchnology was RE: strange new virus
- Next by thread: RE: U3 TEchnology was RE: strange new virus
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|