Re: Whole disk encryption
- From: Denis Jedig <seclists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2006 21:33:30 +0200
Paul Giddens wrote:
GIVEN that, if you are concerned about security and want to use
encryption,
WHY would you choose to NOT do full disk?
From a functionality perspective the answer is simple: more encryption will cost more performance (unless the disk itself supports en/decryption in real time).
From a security perspective:
- because you might have a computer used by more than a single person
- because you might have a person using more than a single computer (and still wanting to be able to en/decrypt his data everywhere)
- because you might have a person who does neither own nor administer a computer and needs the ability to change the encryption keys herself
Pretty much like with transport vs. end-to-end encryption there are uses for both types of storage encryption. They might be completing each other in a security solution but will not be able to act as functional substitutes for each other.
Denis
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- References:
- RE: Whole disk encryption
- From: Paul Giddens
- RE: Whole disk encryption
- Prev by Date: RE: Whole disk encryption
- Next by Date: RE: Whole disk encryption
- Previous by thread: RE: Whole disk encryption
- Next by thread: Re: Whole disk encryption
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|