RE: Whole disk encryption
- From: "Galin, Matt (THIP, Corp)" <matt.galin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 23:23:53 -0400
Very simple... Cruddy legacy applications, most of which most
corporations require to survive in their business, need write access to
lots of places to work.. Some of the most obnoixous need write access to
\system32, let alone C:\temp, vs %temp%, c:\, program files eyc.
-----Original Message-----
From: matthew patton [mailto:pattonme@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 11:23 AM
To: focus-ms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Whole disk encryption
I am not arguing against whole-disk, but why would you hand a user a
computer/laptop that allows them to write ANYWHERE but in one directory,
their homedir?
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
*************************************************************************
This communication, including attachments, is
for the exclusive use of addressee and may contain proprietary,
confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient, any use, copying, disclosure, dissemination or distribution is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this communication and
destroy all copies.
*************************************************************************
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Prev by Date: Re: Whole disk encryption
- Next by Date: FW: MST transforms templates from sec persepctive?
- Previous by thread: RE: Whole disk encryption
- Next by thread: RE: Whole disk encryption
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading