RE: DACLS for software distribution points...

At Wednesday, July 05, 2006 6:02 PM:, Murad Talukdar wrote:

Hi all,
MS says in this article that the DACLS for software distribution
points should be EVERYONE: READ and Administrator: Full Control,
Change, Read.


http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServer/en/Library/45a873dd-660d-4de
6-aa
c4-8a03974796121033.mspx?mfr=true

Why shouldn't the EVERYONE be removed and replaced with Authenticated
Users?
I was thinking of doing this and can't really see any adverse impact.

It probably won't have any adverse impact, but do remember that in XP
and 2003 Everyone no longer allows anonymous access unless explicitly
permitted by Group Policy, so there is no effective difference.

--
Devin L. Ganger Email: deving@xxxxxxxxxx
3Sharp LLC Phone: 425.882.1032 x 109
15311 NE 90th Street Cell: 425.239.2575
Redmond, WA 98052 Fax: 425.702.8455
(e)Mail Insecurity: http://blogs.3sharp.com/blog/deving/

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Relevant Pages

  • RE: DACLS for software distribution points...
    ... DACLS for software distribution points... ... should be EVERYONE: READ and Administrator: Full Control, Change, Read. ... I was thinking of doing this and can't really see any adverse impact. ...
    (Focus-Microsoft)
  • RE: DACLS for software distribution points...
    ... which would make it irrelevant whether or not anonymous access was allowed ... DACLS for software distribution points... ... It probably won't have any adverse impact, ...
    (Focus-Microsoft)
Quantcast