RE: Security templates and settings in Windows XP
- From: Barrie Dempster <barrie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:10:56 +0000
On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 13:26 -0500, Levinson, Karl wrote:
<snip>
> In reality they've probably already validated most if not all of the
> vulnerability. Microsoft seems to have decided for some reason that it is
> not in their [or maybe our] best interest for them to validate
> vulnerabilities until there is a patch out. Possibly they feel validating
> the vuln to the world increases the risk rather than decreasing it.
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/912840.mspx
Isn't a security advisory validating the existence of the
vulnerability ?
--
With Regards..
Barrie Dempster (zeedo) - Fortiter et Strenue
"He who hingeth aboot, geteth hee-haw" Victor - Still Game
blog: http://reboot-robot.net
sites: http://www.bsrf.org.uk - http://www.security-forums.com
ca: https://www.cacert.org/index.php?id=3
Attachment:smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
- References:
- RE: Security templates and settings in Windows XP
- From: Levinson, Karl
- RE: Security templates and settings in Windows XP
- Prev by Date: RE: Security templates and settings in Windows XP
- Next by Date: Re: Security templates and settings in Windows XP
- Previous by thread: RE: Security templates and settings in Windows XP
- Next by thread: RE: Security templates and settings in Windows XP
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|