Re: sober resurfacing
- From: Jason Thompson <securitux@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 13:57:50 -0500
Sober's previous variants access NTP on port 37, so blocking port 123
(NTP) won't do anything. As long as the new variant follows the same
pattern, block port 37 and SMTP from anything other than mail servers
and you shold minimize the impact.
If your internal clients aren't using an internal time source, they
should be. Set up a few BSD boxes or routers with NTP services and
allow those and those only to sync time with an external source. Then
even IF the variant uses port 123, it still won't be able to get out
and check the time with its predefined server list because you would
have locked down port 123 outbound to only 2 or so hosts.
-J
On 12/15/05, Curt Shaffer <cshaffer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> All,
>
> I am working on a plan to try and help minimize the effect of the possible
> sober resurfacing on Jan. 5/6th. After reading the security focus article
> that this worm relies on NTP to know when to release, I am wondering on the
> feasibility of blocking NTP out to the internet that week except for the
> certain devices that need it. Does anyone have input on this?
>
> Thanks
>
> Curt
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- References:
- sober resurfacing
- From: Curt Shaffer
- sober resurfacing
- Prev by Date: Re: sober resurfacing
- Next by Date: RE: sober resurfacing
- Previous by thread: Re: sober resurfacing
- Next by thread: RE: sober resurfacing
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|