RE: ISA Server or Firewall Appliance?
From: matthew patton (pattonme_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 11/19/05
- Previous message: Jim Harrison (ISA): "RE: ISA Server or Firewall Appliance?"
- Maybe in reply to: Marcos Marrero: "ISA Server or Firewall Appliance?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 15:32:26 -0800 (PST) To: focus-ms@securityfocus.com
OpenBSD floppy image (nowadays we'd do a USB drive or CD boot). local
disk for logging only and filesystem tagged append-only. The P90 ran
for 3 years essentially unattended. I build Solaris 10 servers with
<120 packages (that's with enough X11 to run clients) vs the vendor's
notion of "minimal" install of over 350 packages. Clearly I don't rate
Sun's defaults very highly. I can get similarly close with RH et. al.
Why can't I accomplish the same thing with windows? And we're supposed
to take Microsoft seriously? (how's that for ISA/M$ bashing)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: Jim Harrison (ISA): "RE: ISA Server or Firewall Appliance?"
- Maybe in reply to: Marcos Marrero: "ISA Server or Firewall Appliance?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
