RE: ISA Server or Firewall Appliance?
From: James Eaton-Lee (james.mailing_at_gmail.com)
Date: 11/18/05
- Previous message: Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]: "Re: SBS always a security compromise ?"
- In reply to: Jim Harrison (ISA): "RE: ISA Server or Firewall Appliance?"
- Next in thread: Jim Harrison (ISA): "RE: ISA Server or Firewall Appliance?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Jim Harrison (ISA)" <Jim.Harrison@microsoft.com> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:23:03 +0000
Jim,
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 13:28 -0800, Jim Harrison (ISA) wrote:
> Your statements are fine as far as they go, but there is real (as
> opposed to anecdotal) data that directly contradicts your stated
> concerns.
> There are *lots* of Enterprise networks running ISA 2000 and/or ISA 2004
> on the edge.
> Several of these customers have also consented to public case studies
> which are (proudly) posted on the microosft.com/isaserver pages.
>
> Short story - no one has offered anything more than "ancient history" to
> counter the facts offered in ISA's favor.
Not to be flippant, but I tried - I wasn't really trying to ISA bash,
but I disagreed with you when you said on Tuesday that:
> I know it sounds like marketing spew, but the simple fact is; in 5+
> years of service on anything from an SBS server, OEM appliance to HUGE
> enterprise deployments, ISA server has the distinction of not having
> been the recipient of one single exploit in the wild.
>
and then that...
> I know it sounds like marketing spew, but the simple fact is; in 5+
> years of service on anything from an SBS server, OEM appliance to HUGE
> enterprise deployments, ISA server has the distinction of not having
> been the recipient of one single exploit in the wild.
..more specifically, the bulk of my point was that you weren't comparing
like with like, you were comparing a whole firewall platform
(IOS/Juniper) with something (ISA) which is just a firewalling stack
which necessarily has pre-requisite software which it's combined with to
make up the whole firewall, and ignoring the platform (windows) which it
was running on top of.
So far I haven't had a reply.. ;)
If you want to discuss this, I'd be more than happy to re-send my
original post on this topic to the list, as this is really a
bastardisation of what I was originally trying to say!
>
- James.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]: "Re: SBS always a security compromise ?"
- In reply to: Jim Harrison (ISA): "RE: ISA Server or Firewall Appliance?"
- Next in thread: Jim Harrison (ISA): "RE: ISA Server or Firewall Appliance?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]