runas vs network connections etc etc....
From: Murad Talukdar (talukdar_m_at_subway.com)
Date: 09/12/05
- Previous message: Marc Fossi: "SecurityFocus Microsoft Newsletter #255"
- Next in thread: Soluk, Kirk: "RE: runas vs network connections etc etc...."
- Maybe reply: Soluk, Kirk: "RE: runas vs network connections etc etc...."
- Maybe reply: Derick Anderson: "RE: runas vs network connections etc etc...."
- Maybe reply: Soluk, Kirk: "RE: runas vs network connections etc etc...."
- Maybe reply: Murad Talukdar: "RE: runas vs network connections etc etc...."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:42:04 +1000 To: focus-ms@securityfocus.com
Hi all,
I have been trying to work out how to runas admin for several different
special folders eg network connections and printers and faxes etc and
following the advice about opening separate processes given here;
http://blogs.msdn.com/aaron_margosis/archive/2004/07/07/175488.aspx
have found it a workaround.
Is this ideal? As far as I can see it works.
What do others do to get privileges when needed for these essentials? This
can be a real problem when it comes to troubleshooting users machines and
this is the best 'fix' I have come across.
Kind Regards
Murad Talukdar
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: Marc Fossi: "SecurityFocus Microsoft Newsletter #255"
- Next in thread: Soluk, Kirk: "RE: runas vs network connections etc etc...."
- Maybe reply: Soluk, Kirk: "RE: runas vs network connections etc etc...."
- Maybe reply: Derick Anderson: "RE: runas vs network connections etc etc...."
- Maybe reply: Soluk, Kirk: "RE: runas vs network connections etc etc...."
- Maybe reply: Murad Talukdar: "RE: runas vs network connections etc etc...."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|