Re: To disable SMB packet and secure channel signing enforcement on Windows Server 2003-based domain controllers
gjl_at_fullduplex.com.sg
Date: 05/11/05
- Previous message: Depp, Dennis M.: "RE: Encrypting remote files with EFS"
- In reply to: Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]: "Re: To disable SMB packet and secure channel signing enforcement on Windows Server 2003-based domain controllers"
- Next in thread: Murad Talukdar: "RE: To disable SMB packet and secure channel signing enforcement on Windows Server 2003-based domain controllers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]" <sbradcpa@pacbell.net> Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 09:56:50 +0800
Hi folks,
I have just had similar words with Konica Minolta. What they have supplied
my custmer can only talk FTP.
Try Canon - even an old Canon IR series is happily talking to a mixed W2K
/ W2K3. Admittedly i am not sure if the enviroment is forcing SMB, but at
least it talks to Windows without some additional software or services.
Regards
Gordon
==================================
Gordon Lamb
Fullduplex Asia Pacific
Registered Office
143 Cecil St
#07-03/04 GB Building
Singapore 069542
==================================
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: Depp, Dennis M.: "RE: Encrypting remote files with EFS"
- In reply to: Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]: "Re: To disable SMB packet and secure channel signing enforcement on Windows Server 2003-based domain controllers"
- Next in thread: Murad Talukdar: "RE: To disable SMB packet and secure channel signing enforcement on Windows Server 2003-based domain controllers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]