RE: Microsoft rights management server alternatives
From: Derek Schaible (dschaible_at_cssiinc.com)
Date: 11/23/04
- Previous message: Thompson, Tichard: "RE: Microsoft rights management server alternatives"
- In reply to: Thompson, Tichard: "RE: Microsoft rights management server alternatives"
- Next in thread: Joshua Feek: "RE: Microsoft rights management server alternatives"
- Reply: Joshua Feek: "RE: Microsoft rights management server alternatives"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Thompson, Tichard" <Tichard.Thompson@pharma.com> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:27:04 -0500
On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 14:58, Thompson, Tichard wrote:
> As far as copy in paste to a document, If you choose the right
> technique for rights managed content, you can also protect content that
> is copied from one doc to another while also keeping a running audit
> trail of how the document is being accessed no matter where it goes. I
> believe this technology has a long way to go but we are seeing a fine
> start.
Well, not really. It wont log a screenshot, will it? :-)
And I can open Rights protected files under Linux with zero
restrictions.
Personally, I think its nothing more than a false sense of security.
Legal disclaimers satisfy the same legal protection with much less cost.
-- Derek Schaible <dschaible@cssiinc.com> CSSI, Inc.
- application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part
- Previous message: Thompson, Tichard: "RE: Microsoft rights management server alternatives"
- In reply to: Thompson, Tichard: "RE: Microsoft rights management server alternatives"
- Next in thread: Joshua Feek: "RE: Microsoft rights management server alternatives"
- Reply: Joshua Feek: "RE: Microsoft rights management server alternatives"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|