RE: PPTP versus L2TP and possible attacks
From: Zachary Mutrux (zmutrux_at_compumentor.org)
Date: 02/14/04
- Previous message: Marc Fossi: "Article Announcement: Wireless Honeypot Trickery"
- In reply to: Patrick Power: "Re: PPTP versus L2TP and possible attacks"
- Next in thread: James D. Stallard: "RE: PPTP versus L2TP and possible attacks - what next?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: <focus-ms@securityfocus.com> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:46:34 -0800
"At this point we still do not recommend Microsoft PPTP for applications
where security is a factor."
But it's OK for your everyday, run of the mill VPN. As long as security
isn't a factor.
zm
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick Power [mailto:ppower@registrypro.pro]
> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 1:31 PM
> To: Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
> Cc: James D. Stallard; focus-ms@securityfocus.com
> Subject: Re: PPTP versus L2TP and possible attacks
>
> Here's a nice reference:
> http://www.schneier.com/pptp.html
- application/x-pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
- Previous message: Marc Fossi: "Article Announcement: Wireless Honeypot Trickery"
- In reply to: Patrick Power: "Re: PPTP versus L2TP and possible attacks"
- Next in thread: James D. Stallard: "RE: PPTP versus L2TP and possible attacks - what next?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
