Re: RE: Disabling sharing and group policies

robert_at_snrdesigns.com
Date: 09/10/03

  • Next message: Birl: "Re: windows 2000 security logs"
    To: "Arik Fletcher" <arikf@joskos.com>
    Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 15:40:39 -0400
    
    
    

    While certanly you would not be able to affect anything on the Domain but if you set the "HKCU\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\System\GroupPolicyRefreshTime" value to be very high (10 years should be good), would that not allow you to change the local machine properties at will???? As long as you do not re-boot or drop the network connection they will stay in affect on the local machine.
    >
    > From: "Arik Fletcher" <arikf@joskos.com>
    > Date: 2003/09/10 Wed AM 11:43:43 EDT
    > To: <robert@snrdesigns.com>, "Enrico Pastrello" <epastrello@altevie.com>,
    > <focus-ms@securityfocus.com>
    > Subject: RE: Disabling sharing and group policies
    >
    > Group policies are applied in what is know as LSDO (or LSDOU) which stands for Local, Site, Domain, Organisational Unit. This is the order in which poilicies apply to a computer/user.
    >
    > One cannot 'bypass' group policies by editing the local registry because if there is a conflict between the local settings and the nearest parent container (i.e. an OU, Domain, or Site) these will override the local settings.
    >
    >
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Robert Blackwell [mailto:robert@snrdesigns.com]
    > Sent: Wed 9/10/2003 5:11 AM
    > To: Enrico Pastrello; focus-ms@securityfocus.com
    > Cc:
    > Subject: RE: Disabling sharing and group policies
    >
    >
    >
    > yes they can. In-fact, anyone who has physical access to the box can render
    > the majority of group policy objects useless, but that's another story. I'm
    > not too clear on what you are wanting to do. If you just want to get rid of
    > the everyone share on a local machine, disallow all anonymous access and
    > disable the guest account. the everyone share will still be there but it
    > will be effectively disabled by these settings. group policies are not
    > really needed to do this. Somebody please correct me if this is not the
    > case.
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Enrico Pastrello [mailto:epastrello@altevie.com]
    > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 8:40 AM
    > To: focus-ms@securityfocus.com
    > Subject: RE: Disabling sharing and group policies
    >
    >
    > Maybe I'm saying something quite stupid but since group policies are saved
    > in the registry,
    > machine administrators can easilly bypass them.
    >
    > Greetings,
    > Enrico Pastrello
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Matthew Wagenknecht [mailto:Matthew.Wagenknecht@quantum.com]
    > Sent: lunedì 8 settembre 2003 18.49
    > To: focus-ms@securityfocus.com
    > Subject: Disabling sharing and group policies
    >
    >
    > Is there a way with Group Policies to disable sharing without pulling users
    > from the Administrator group or killing adminstrative shares? I'm looking
    > for a way to reduce "everyone" shares without flogging end users. Strangely,
    > that actually sounds fun.. ;c)
    >
    > Please keep flames off the list.
    >
    > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    > Matt Wagenknecht, CISSP
    > Security Administrator
    > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    >
    > Never be afraid to try something new.
    > Remember, amateurs built the ark; professionals built the Titanic.
    >
    >
    > This email may contain confidential and privileged information for the sole
    > use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is
    > strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
    > the sender and delete all copies of this email message.
    >
    >
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > KaVaDo provides the first and only integrated Web application scanner and
    > firewall security suite that prevent Web applications attacks, the most
    > common form of online exploitation. Download a FREE whitepaper on Security
    > Policy Automation for Web Applications.
    > http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/KaVaDo_focus-ms_030818
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    >
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > KaVaDo provides the first and only integrated Web application scanner and
    > firewall security suite that prevent Web applications attacks, the most
    > common form of online exploitation. Download a FREE whitepaper on Security
    > Policy Automation for Web Applications.
    > http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/KaVaDo_focus-ms_030818
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    >
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > KaVaDo provides the first and only integrated Web application scanner and
    > firewall security suite that prevent Web applications attacks, the most
    > common form of online exploitation. Download a FREE whitepaper on Security Policy Automation for Web Applications.
    > http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/KaVaDo_focus-ms_030818
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    >
    >
    >

    
    

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    KaVaDo provides the first and only integrated Web application scanner and
    firewall security suite that prevent Web applications attacks, the most
    common form of online exploitation. Download a FREE whitepaper on Security Policy Automation for Web Applications.
    http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/KaVaDo_focus-ms_030818
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------


  • Next message: Birl: "Re: windows 2000 security logs"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Why Programs get written to need admin priveleges.
      ... >>Why administrators must pesuade some applications to run with ... >>firewall security suite that prevent Web applications ... >>common form of online exploitation. ... >>Security Policy Automation for Web Applications. ...
      (Focus-Microsoft)
    • Re: focus-ms@securityfocus.com
      ... local password caching need never be to a local file on a ... ticket issued Kerberose must use some sort of credential caching. ... > firewall security suite that prevent Web applications attacks, ...
      (Focus-Microsoft)
    • RE: Patch testing
      ... If you don't have mirrored disk capabilities - use Norton Ghost to snap an ... image of the system partition on the server before patching. ... > firewall security suite that prevent Web applications ... > whitepaper on Security Policy Automation for Web Applications. ...
      (Focus-Microsoft)
    • RE: Limiting users on secific machines that are part of a domain
      ... firewall security suite that prevent Web applications attacks, ... common form of online exploitation. ... Security Policy Automation for Web Applications. ...
      (Focus-Microsoft)
    • RE: Patch testing
      ... Just a thought, use mirrored disks, then before installing the patch ... Removable harddrives (if you can afford server downtime): ... firewall security suite that prevent Web applications attacks, ... Policy Automation for Web Applications. ...
      (Focus-Microsoft)