RE: DCOM patch + Exchange
From: Chris Gianelloni (wolf31o2_at_charter.net)
Date: 08/19/03
- Previous message: dacruz_at_star-1.com: "RE: DCOM patch + Exchange"
- In reply to: dacruz_at_star-1.com: "RE: DCOM patch + Exchange"
- Next in thread: Lee Evans: "RE: DCOM patch + Exchange"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: dacruz@star-1.com Date: 19 Aug 2003 15:12:08 -0400
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 13:28, dacruz@star-1.com wrote:
> Exchange needs The RPC protocol to communicate which happens to be port 135
> most likely your isp desided to block communications thru that port and that
> is why exchange does not work for external users except vpn, am having the
> same problem since some genius at my isp decided to fight the worm by
> blocking the port enterprise wide and now guess who the virus is to me? My
> isp they are causing me more problems than the virus itself , am
> patch/firewalled/virus protected all the tools to combat the frigging worm,
> but not my isp wants to take care of it for me really? By blocking the port?
> Great!! Am so happy now for your info the isp am having the problem with is
> SBC or charter communications in Madison and Chicago, my other isp's did not
> think that way and am glad
Exchange works quite well without access to port 135, thank you. In
fact, having 135 exposed to the Internet is simply a bad idea to begin
with. I am sure that is not the problem since I have *never* had 135
exposed and never will.
- application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part
- Previous message: dacruz_at_star-1.com: "RE: DCOM patch + Exchange"
- In reply to: dacruz_at_star-1.com: "RE: DCOM patch + Exchange"
- Next in thread: Lee Evans: "RE: DCOM patch + Exchange"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|