RE: Windows 2000 password policy
From: David Stevens (dstevens_at_andrew.cmu.edu)
Date: 06/24/03
- Previous message: Jim Barrett: "RE: Windows 2000 password policy"
- In reply to: Jim Barrett: "RE: Windows 2000 password policy"
- Next in thread: Jim Barrett: "RE: Windows 2000 password policy"
- Reply: Jim Barrett: "RE: Windows 2000 password policy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 08:06:23 -0400 To: focus-ms@securityfocus.com
--On Monday, June 23, 2003 4:59 PM -0400 you wrote Jim Barrett
<jimb@ins.com> wrote:
> Nope. You can't get there from here as the saying goes. This is
> because Windows 2000 had to maintain backward compatibility with NT 4.0,
> and in NT 4, the Domain was the security boundary. Same is true with
> W2k/W2k3.
errr. Correction. The forest is the security boundary in Win2k/Win2k3.
Dave Stevens
Carnegie Mellon University
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: Jim Barrett: "RE: Windows 2000 password policy"
- In reply to: Jim Barrett: "RE: Windows 2000 password policy"
- Next in thread: Jim Barrett: "RE: Windows 2000 password policy"
- Reply: Jim Barrett: "RE: Windows 2000 password policy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]