Re: SUS server
From: Chuck Meeusen (cmeeusen@optonline.net)
Date: 04/07/03
- Previous message: Thane Walkup: "RE: SUS server"
- In reply to: Thane Walkup: "RE: SUS server"
- Next in thread: Brian W. Spolarich: "RE: SUS server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 13:35:09 -0400 From: Chuck Meeusen <cmeeusen@optonline.net> To: "focus-ms@securityfocus.com" <focus-ms@securityfocus.com>
A claim like this requires a specific quote to support it. Could you please
indicate where you got this information from?
Thanks,
Chuck
Thane Walkup wrote:
> One VERY good reason not to run SP3 is possible HIPAA and 21CFR11
> regulation issues - since the license for SP3 technically gives
> Microsoft unfettered access to your PC, any company under those
> regulations could be in violation of those regulations.
>
> This affects just about any medical facility.
>
> Thanks,
> Thane
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Fike - ADCS Inc. [mailto:dfike@adcs.com]
<b>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Block Spam, Smut & Viruses
SurfControl E-mail Filter for SMTP & Exchange leverages multiple layers of
technology including filtering embedded and attached file content. Rid your
enterprise of unwanted content.
http://www.securityfocus.com/SurfControl-focus-ms2
Download your free fully functional trial, complete with 30-days of free
technical support.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
</b>
- Previous message: Thane Walkup: "RE: SUS server"
- In reply to: Thane Walkup: "RE: SUS server"
- Next in thread: Brian W. Spolarich: "RE: SUS server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|