RE: issues with syskey in NT 4.0
From: jason d. montgomery (jason@atgi.com)
Date: 12/02/02
- Previous message: Kolde, Jennifer E.: "RE: issues with syskey in NT 4.0"
- In reply to: Paul Greene: "issues with syskey in NT 4.0"
- Next in thread: The Blueberry: "RE: issues with syskey in NT 4.0"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "jason d. montgomery" <jason@atgi.com> To: <focus-ms@securityfocus.com> Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 16:12:14 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
You may have done this already, but if not run a search on the MS TechNet site for 'Syskey' - you'll pull back a bunch of known issues - from first glance, it looks like all issues are resolved by Service Packs, Patches, or proper configuration):
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/
Article(s) I found of particular interest:
Analysis of Alleged Vulnerability in Windows 2000 Syskey and the Encrypting File System
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/news/efs.asp
and
Analysis of Reported Vulnerability in the Windows 2000 Encrypting File System (EFS)
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/analefs.asp
later,
jdm
> Is there any known issues with enabling syskey under NT 4.0? In other
> words, does enabling syskey break any functionality, or cause any other
> problems for either the operating system itself or for any application?
>
> (I'm having a bit of an argument with a client over enabling syskey; I'm
> strongly recommending they use it, but they don't want to for various
> reasons i.e. they're afraid it'll break something or cause other kinds
> of problems; I'm not aware of any issues that could justify their fears).
>
> Paul Greene
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAj3rzK4ACgkQ/o/QohhvQMuGrACgs+B8GaWtjFrceYVav4kXRTsP
7z8An2GvmAsoc3pp2Wch8iz3fktGwlY8
=HALg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Next message: The Blueberry: "RE: issues with syskey in NT 4.0"
- Previous message: Kolde, Jennifer E.: "RE: issues with syskey in NT 4.0"
- In reply to: Paul Greene: "issues with syskey in NT 4.0"
- Next in thread: The Blueberry: "RE: issues with syskey in NT 4.0"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|