RE: Secure / Encrypt Terminal Services
From: Eric Devine (devineeric@yahoo.com)
Date: 11/27/02
- Previous message: Mike Coppins: "Re: IIS Log exactly 65.536 bytes ???"
- Maybe in reply to: ohnonono@hushmail.com: "Secure / Encrypt Terminal Services"
- Next in thread: Kent Hundley: "RE: Secure / Encrypt Terminal Services"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 07:00:14 -0800 (PST) From: Eric Devine <devineeric@yahoo.com> To: focus-ms@securityfocus.com
How does this sort of thing affect the ActiveX
Terminal services option in IE? as far as I know
there is no way to point that to a different
port? The nice thing about the IE option is any
computer with IE can be used and the Client is
self installing so I don't need to keep a floppy
disk handy.
Hmm.. I will bet I get jumped all over in the
reply's because whenever something is easy it is
generally not secure :)
Previously written Message thread
Follows---------
--------------------------------------------------
if you change the ts port - the pocket pc clients
definitely will not be
able to connect, they don't seem to understand
the server:port syntax. (not
that you asked about pocket pcs - but i brought
it up so i wanted to include
these details)
so make sure you check out this kb article...
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;304304
..which tells you how to alter the remote desktop
client connection port.
remote desktop client is the one which came with
windows xp and is much
better/more stable than the one included with
windows 2000.
grab the remote desktop client here...
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;304304
yeah, it is REALLY annoying that the high
encryption pack for pocket pcs
doesn't alter the ts encryption level available
to those clients.
-d
-----Original Message-----
From: Deus, Attonbitus
[mailto:Thor@HammerofGod.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 7:14 AM
To: ohnonono@hushmail.com;
focus-ms@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Secure / Encrypt Terminal Services
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
At 06:21 AM 11/21/2002, ohnonono@hushmail.com
wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>Does the community have an opinion on which is
the best way to do
>this? Can it be done via IP-Sec? Basically we
have a machine (tripwire
>manager) that will have access to all our
networks. Due to politics
>(gotta love security made insecure by politics)
it must be remotely
>managed. The CIO (god bless CIO's) has decided
that we will use terminal
>services. Is there a way to encrypt the traffic
so it is not flying
>around the network in clear text? Would IP-Sec
be the recomended solution?
>
>Suggestions or links (or gentle shoves) to the
information would be great.
The TS sessions are encrypted by default- data is
not sent in the
"clear." You may set the encryption level for
the RDP session in the
Terminal Services Configuration mmc if you want
to change the default
"medium" (56bit) encryption to "high" (128bit).
Note though, that setting
the encryption level to "high" will break things
like the PocketPC Terminal
Services client, which can only use 56bit
encryption. In environments like
that, I'll VPN in, and then use the "medium"
session. Funny that the
PocketPC will support a 128bit VPN client, but
only 56bit for a TS client.
If this box will be on the net itself, ensure
that you change the TS
listening port (see Q187623
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;en-us;187623
), rename
the administrator account and give all the
accounts strong passwords. A
logon banner helps too. I'd also use the IPSec
mmc to lock down all ports
except what is necessary for your environment.
hth
AD
"Experience is something you don't get until just
after you need it."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.1
iQA/AwUBPeOPsohsmyD15h5gEQLstgCfWcZqgSj1ZmfE/WcBggW/vyvxq8oAoL9r
F7Pm4TOmXU39pr+01KXh2Sh7
=oWEw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
- Next message: M. Burnett: "RE: Secure / Encrypt Terminal Services"
- Previous message: Mike Coppins: "Re: IIS Log exactly 65.536 bytes ???"
- Maybe in reply to: ohnonono@hushmail.com: "Secure / Encrypt Terminal Services"
- Next in thread: Kent Hundley: "RE: Secure / Encrypt Terminal Services"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|