RE: outlook 2000 vs latest outlook express deployment
From: David Vincent (david.vincent@mightyoaks.com)
Date: 11/20/02
- Previous message: jmcguire@sbcs.com: "Re: outlook 2000 vs latest outlook express deployment"
- Maybe in reply to: auto472736@hushmail.com: "outlook 2000 vs latest outlook express deployment"
- Next in thread: Toni Lassila: "RE: outlook 2000 vs latest outlook express deployment"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: David Vincent <david.vincent@mightyoaks.com> To: 'Eric' <ews@tellurian.net>, auto472736@hushmail.com, focus-ms@securityfocus.com Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 08:58:01 -0800
microsoft released Office 2000 SP3 last week...
http://office.microsoft.com/downloads/2000/o2ksp3.aspx
includes the outlook 2000 sr-1 email security update as well as all other
updates to this point (as far as i can tell - i created an admin install
point, updated with sp3 and installed to a fresh install of w2k then visited
the office update site - nothing to do!)
i've updated 20 machines with this one, with no issues reported yet.
-d
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric [mailto:ews@tellurian.net]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 2:19 PM
To: auto472736@hushmail.com; focus-ms@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: outlook 2000 vs latest outlook express deployment
as long as you've applied the latest Office 2000 Service Pack (SP2
http://office.microsoft.com/downloads/2000/SP2upd.aspx) you will be in
decent shape. Office 2000 SP2 includes the Outlook Email Security Update
(OESU)
If you don't have Office 2000 SP2, but you do have Office SR-1a, you can
download the Outlook email security update separately. More info on
Security and Outlook and the OESU here:
http://www.microsoft.com/office/outlook/evaluation/security.asp
FAQ is here:
http://office.microsoft.com/assistance/2000/Out2ksecFAQ.aspx
the actual OESU is here:
http://office.microsoft.com/Downloads/2000/Out2ksec.aspx
the KB article about the update is here:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q235309&id=KB;EN-US
Q235309
the OESU is also included in Office 2002.
Outlook Express is an entirely different product, built by a different team
(nuff said). You should use Outlook, and not OE, if possible.
At 09:01 PM 11/17/2002 -0800, auto472736@hushmail.com wrote:
>All,
>
>Our school have been using eudora for many years. Due to political
>reasons, we now have to migrate to outlook. We have licensed copies of
>Outlook 2000 which provides the tasks, calendar, etc. functions
>and the latest free version of Outlook Express. In terms of security,
>which version is more secure? We do not have a budget for Outlook 2002
>However, we have enough paid Outlook 2000 licenses to more than accomadate
>everyone at this point. I am just concerned with the security issues. We
>already have an antivirus solution at the mail gateway and also NAV on the
>user desktops.
>
>Thanks.
>
>
>
>
>
>Get your free encrypted email at https://www.hushmail.com
- Next message: Girts Bitenieks: "RE: outlook 2000 vs latest outlook express deployment"
- Previous message: jmcguire@sbcs.com: "Re: outlook 2000 vs latest outlook express deployment"
- Maybe in reply to: auto472736@hushmail.com: "outlook 2000 vs latest outlook express deployment"
- Next in thread: Toni Lassila: "RE: outlook 2000 vs latest outlook express deployment"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|