Re: outlook 2000 vs latest outlook express deployment
From: jmcguire@sbcs.com
Date: 11/20/02
- Previous message: focus-ms-help@securityfocus.com: "ezmlm warning"
- Maybe in reply to: auto472736@hushmail.com: "outlook 2000 vs latest outlook express deployment"
- Next in thread: Bronek Kozicki: "Re: outlook 2000 vs latest outlook express deployment"
- Reply: Bronek Kozicki: "Re: outlook 2000 vs latest outlook express deployment"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Frederick Garbrecht" <fgarbrecht@ecogchair.org> From: jmcguire@sbcs.com Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 19:44:19 -0500
The choice really comes down to whether you are using groupware
functionality of Exchange or not. If so, no choice but Outlook. If not,
Outlook Express has a lot less overhead on the desktops. Both are pretty
much the same thing security wise. The minimal difference that may exist (I
really can't think of any) probably would be overshadowed by the groupware
requirement.
__________________________________________
JOHN MCGUIRE CISSP, MCSE2k, MCSE+I, MCT
Network Security Specialist
888.529.0401
jmcguire@sbcs.com
Strictly Business
www.sbcs.com
"Frederick
Garbrecht" To: <focus-ms@securityfocus.com>, <auto472736@hushmail.com>
<fgarbrecht@ecogc cc:
hair.org> Subject: Re: outlook 2000 vs latest outlook express deployment
11/18/2002 08:45
PM
My condolences to you.....I'm not sure about differences in security issues
between the two, but IMHO the most critical issues in securing Outlook /
Outlook Express are 1) keep them very up to date on security hotfixes 2)
familiarize yourself with MS security zones and use them to tightly
restrict
what the mail client can accept. For example, you probably will want to
prohibit unsigned activeX controls and java applets. I restrict everything
that can possibly execute, so no scripts are allowed, no executables, etc.
I'm sure you can probably find some step-by-step commentary on setting up
Outlook clients to maximize security, microsoft has an entire portion of
their site devoted to security issues, so you should check that out. Oh,
and don't forget to educate your users about double-clicking on attachments
that they don't expect........
Fred
----- Original Message -----
From: <auto472736@hushmail.com>
To: <focus-ms@securityfocus.com>
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 12:01 AM
Subject: outlook 2000 vs latest outlook express deployment
>
> All,
>
> Our school have been using eudora for many years. Due to political
reasons, we now have to migrate to outlook. We have licensed copies of
Outlook 2000 which provides the tasks, calendar, etc. functions
> and the latest free version of Outlook Express. In terms of security,
which version is more secure? We do not have a budget for Outlook 2002
However, we have enough paid Outlook 2000 licenses to more than accomadate
everyone at this point. I am just concerned with the security issues. We
already have an antivirus solution at the mail gateway and also NAV on the
user desktops.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
>
>
> Get your free encrypted email at https://www.hushmail.com
>
- Next message: David Vincent: "RE: outlook 2000 vs latest outlook express deployment"
- Previous message: focus-ms-help@securityfocus.com: "ezmlm warning"
- Maybe in reply to: auto472736@hushmail.com: "outlook 2000 vs latest outlook express deployment"
- Next in thread: Bronek Kozicki: "Re: outlook 2000 vs latest outlook express deployment"
- Reply: Bronek Kozicki: "Re: outlook 2000 vs latest outlook express deployment"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|