RE: Does W2K hold user's email, EFS etc private key securely ?
From: Schwarz, Roland (Roland.Schwarz@bdr.de)Date: 09/16/02
- Previous message: zero: "Database security"
- Maybe in reply to: Phil Pinder: "Does W2K hold user's email, EFS etc private key securely ?"
- Next in thread: Laura A. Robinson: "Re: Does W2K hold user's email, EFS etc private key securely ?"
- Reply: Laura A. Robinson: "Re: Does W2K hold user's email, EFS etc private key securely ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Schwarz, Roland" <Roland.Schwarz@bdr.de> To: focus-ms@securityfocus.com Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 15:35:40 +0200
Could you provide any details on how you
implemented EFS keys on smart cards.
Official MS whitepapers say that this is not possible.
Thanks
Roland
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fred.Langston@guardent.com [mailto:Fred.Langston@guardent.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 12:48 AM
> To: bkml@att.net; fp56@dial.pipex.com; focus-ms@securityfocus.com
> Subject: RE: Does W2K hold user's email, EFS etc private key
> securely ?
>
> We are currently using EFS key storage on Smart cards with
> XP, so that one's
> incorrect. This one goes a long way toward solving the
> previously mentioned
> problem. At the time of your SANS article, you were correct,
> but things
> have changed with, as you said, newer versions.
>
- Previous message: zero: "Database security"
- Maybe in reply to: Phil Pinder: "Does W2K hold user's email, EFS etc private key securely ?"
- Next in thread: Laura A. Robinson: "Re: Does W2K hold user's email, EFS etc private key securely ?"
- Reply: Laura A. Robinson: "Re: Does W2K hold user's email, EFS etc private key securely ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]