Re: MS02-042 Patch on win2k pro kills capability to map to default sh ares

From: Jason Bramley (jbramley@emarket2.com)
Date: 08/23/02


Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 07:55:23 +0100
To: focus-ms@securityfocus.com
From: Jason Bramley <jbramley@emarket2.com>

Hi,

I tried browsing and mapping to \\machine\c$ from a XP Pro box to a 2k
Server (SP3 + patch), no problems found.

I also tried mapping & browsing from a 2k server to a 2k pro (both SP3 +
patch), no problems.

Browsing from a 2k pro (SP3 + patch) to 2k server (SP3 + patch) also works.

I can't find the problem you suggest, however my "Add/Remove Programs" all
display the typical "Windows 2000 Hotfix (Pre-SP4) [See Q326886 for more
details]" entry.

How did you deploy the hotfix?

Jason

At 08:25 PM 22/08/2002, Mitchel Chapman wrote:
>All,
>
>After recently installing ms02-042 patch from windows update to a win2kPro
>machine I was unable to map to any default shares on the system (c$,admin$).
>The message I received said "\\*******\c$ is not accessible. You might not
>have permission to use this network resource. Contact the administrator of
>this server to find out if you have access permissions. Not enough server
>storage is available to process this command."
>
>The machine has sp3 on it along with all other available patches. In the
>system event log the following error message is displayed: "The server's
>configuration parameter "irpstacksize" is too small for the server to use a
>local device. Please increase the value of this parameter."
>
>After searching on MS for that error I came up with
>http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q198386 which
>doesn't show to apply to win2k. Digging around more in the event log showed
>that the error begin occurring immediately after installing the ms02-042
>patch and subsequently after each time I attempted to map to the default
>shares or tried to install a Hercules client to the machine
>(www.citadel.com/hercules.asp). In addition, the system event log showed
>"Windows XP Hotfix Q326886 was installed." This is obviously weird as the
>system the patch was installed to is win2kpro as I said previously.
>
>After uninstalling the patch original access was restored. Has anyone else
>experienced this behavior?
>
>Mitchel Chapman
>Network Security Engineer
>Citadel Security
>www.citadel.com
>mchapman@citadel.com



Relevant Pages

  • RE: MS02-042 Patch on win2k pro kills capability to map to defaul t sh ares
    ... Given that the hotfix is claiming to be an XP one I would ... >Server (SP3 + patch), no problems found. ... >>showed that the error begin occurring immediately after installing the ...
    (Focus-Microsoft)
  • Re: 5.3-RELEASE: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt timout
    ... My problem is not related to a SATA controller. ... Everything works pretty well on this server. ... the qmail MTA, an otherwise pretty powerful email program. ... I'm going to apply a patch to qmail in a few days. ...
    (freebsd-current)
  • Re: MS03-026 patch installation
    ... But want to know that If this patch gives some ... > trouble after installing it on the server, ... > way by which I can uninstall this patch completely from ... and we're installing it on a lot of machines. ...
    (microsoft.public.security)
  • Re: KB917537 Failing
    ... four days after the patch released. ... mature server OS, an enterprise-class messaging system, and automated ... if you hit the "Restart" button ... here as I had assumed this would be a common problem.. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: ER problem / bug? in 11.50.UC3
    ... The engineer develops a patch and performs unit testing to verify that the patch is working. ... The staging branch is built nightly and goes through some 10 hours of automated testing daily. ... catch that you used an uppercase letter when defining the server. ... not necessarily those of the Fonterra Co-operative Group. ...
    (comp.databases.informix)