RE: Q320206 and SP4
From: Eric (ews@tellurian.net)Date: 05/24/02
- Previous message: Daryl Maunder: "RE: Q320206 and SP4"
- In reply to: Daryl Maunder: "RE: Q320206 and SP4"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 15:25:48 -0700 To: "Daryl Maunder" <dmaunder@midnightoil.com.au>, <focus-ms@securityfocus.com> From: Eric <ews@tellurian.net>
the patch says _SP4, however, like the bulletin states, it will be included
in SP3 (I verified this). Yes, it is different than the standard naming
convention and not optimal, but at least it's going to be in SP3.
At 02:25 AM 5/24/2002 +1000, Daryl Maunder wrote:
>It just means SP3 is locked down, ie it is far enough through the beta
>cycle that they arent adding any more to it. So it is around the corner,
>although we might not be up to the corner yet.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Michael Devlin [mailto:Michael.Devlin@figleaves.com]
>Sent: Thursday, 23 May 2002 23:10
>To: focus-ms@securityfocus.com
>Subject: Q320206 and SP4
>
>
>Anyone else noticed that HFNetchk is showing machines unpatched with
>Q320206.... Which is MS02-024.... However the patch is
>Q320206_W2K_SP4_X86_EN.exe available at
><http://www.microsoft.com/Windows2000/downloads/security/q320206/downloa
>d.asp> which is for POST SP3 machines....
>
>Have I been asleep? There is no SP3 as of today is there... so is this a
>typo at Moft HQ or a premature hotfix release? I.e. is SP3 round the
>corner?
>
>Incidentally, I also notice that it is showing up in Windows Update.....
>
>Cheers
>
>Michael
- Previous message: Daryl Maunder: "RE: Q320206 and SP4"
- In reply to: Daryl Maunder: "RE: Q320206 and SP4"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|