Re: net use and LM / NTLM
From: Mike Coppins (mike@legolas.com)Date: 04/12/02
- Previous message: Robinson, Paul (Paul): "RE: VPN / IPSEC"
- In reply to: Laura A. Robinson: "Re: net use and LM / NTLM"
- Next in thread: Laura A. Robinson: "Re: net use and LM / NTLM"
- Reply: Laura A. Robinson: "Re: net use and LM / NTLM"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 00:09:41 +0100 To: focus-ms@securityfocus.com From: Mike Coppins <mike@legolas.com>
At 11/04/2002 17:47, Laura A. Robinson wrote:
>It depends on several things-
>
>First, is it a "net use" to a name, an IP or a GUID?
>Second, what service pack revision is the NT4 server on in the second
>scenario?
>
>Net use to IP, even in a pure Windows 2000 environment, uses NTLMv2.
>Other net use is Kerberos in a pure Win2K environment.
>NT4 SP4+ with Win2k is NTLMv2.
Win2k and NT4 (SP4+), will both talk LanMan (LM) authentication unless
otherwise specified. I know this from experience. For example, two Win2k
machines on the same network, one of which has an LSA registry setting that
says "reject NTLM and LM authentication, accept only LM". You get a
machine that is a default install of Win2k to try and connect to it, no
chance. You'll get "account doesn't exist" in the event log, in true win2k
"report any old error" style. Switch off the "reject NTLM/LM" setting, and
it works fine.
Win2k has issues with authentication (between LM/NTLM/NTLMv2 and
kerberos). In a domain control environment (ie. a DC and a load of nodes
connected to the domain), both windows networking authentication (be it
LM/NTLM/NTLMv2) and kerberos will be sent in some scenarios.
If what you were saying was the case, then on the NT4 SP4 upgrade, the NT4
SP4 machine would suddenly not be able to connect to anything.
Have a read:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-GB;q147706
-- Mike Coppins mike@legolas.com http://www.legolas.com/ Currently looking for work: http://www.legolas.com/mikes/cv.html
- Previous message: Robinson, Paul (Paul): "RE: VPN / IPSEC"
- In reply to: Laura A. Robinson: "Re: net use and LM / NTLM"
- Next in thread: Laura A. Robinson: "Re: net use and LM / NTLM"
- Reply: Laura A. Robinson: "Re: net use and LM / NTLM"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|